Overall score
Coes Creek
35.1/100
Towen Mountain
38.7/100
Coes Creek for families and investment; Towen Mountain for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coes Creek
35.1/100
Towen Mountain
38.7/100
Crime rate
Coes Creek
50.7 / 1k
Towen Mountain
51.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coes Creek
3
Towen Mountain
0
Population
Coes Creek
1,515
Towen Mountain
304
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coes Creek | Towen Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 38.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.0/100 | 50.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.7 / 1k | 51.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 0 |
| Green cover | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,515 | 304 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Coes Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Towen Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Towen Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Coes Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Coes Creek tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus a larger local community, while Towen Mountain stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability.
Coes Creek suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Towen Mountain is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.