Coes Creek vs Towen Mountain, QLD Suburb Comparison

Coes Creek for families and investment; Towen Mountain for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Coes CreekTowen Mountain

Overall score

Coes Creek

35.1/100

Towen Mountain

38.7/100

Crime rate

Coes Creek

50.7 / 1k

Towen Mountain

51.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coes Creek

3

Towen Mountain

0

Population

Coes Creek

1,515

Towen Mountain

304

Metric leadCoes Creek 5Towen Mountain 13 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoes CreekTowen Mountain
Overall score35.1/10038.7/100
Housing (desirability)60.0/10050.1/100
Crime rate50.7 / 1k51.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves1—
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities30
Green cover0.1%0.0%
Population1,515304
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Coes Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Towen Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Towen Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Coes Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Coes Creek tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus a larger local community, while Towen Mountain stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability.

Coes Creek suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Towen Mountain is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons