Overall score
Burnside
60.1/100
Taylors Hill
67.9/100
Burnside for investment; Taylors Hill for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Burnside
60.1/100
Taylors Hill
67.9/100
Crime rate
Burnside
45.6 / 1k
Taylors Hill
31.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Burnside
64
Taylors Hill
347
Population
Burnside
5,800
Taylors Hill
15,419
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Burnside | Taylors Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.1/100 | 67.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.5/100 | 64.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 45.6 / 1k | 31.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 20 | 35 |
| Walkability | 76.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 64 | 347 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 8 |
| Population | 5,800 | 15,419 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Burnside is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Taylors Hill is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Burnside tends to lead on housing affordability, while Taylors Hill stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Choose Burnside if you are weighing investors; lean toward Taylors Hill for retirees.