Overall score
California Gully
38.9/100
Myers Flat
45.3/100
California Gully for families and investment; Myers Flat for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
California Gully
38.9/100
Myers Flat
45.3/100
Crime rate
California Gully
138.8 / 1k
Myers Flat
21.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
California Gully
117
Myers Flat
3
Population
California Gully
4,476
Myers Flat
545
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | California Gully | Myers Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.9/100 | 45.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 73.2/100 | 51.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 138.8 / 1k | 21.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 24 | — |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 117 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 18 |
| Green cover | 18.9% | 6.1% |
| Population | 4,476 | 545 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
California Gully is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Myers Flat is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. California Gully sits among greener hillside streets, while Myers Flat keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, California Gully is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability; Myers Flat answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. California Gully generally means more approachable housing costs, while Myers Flat leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find California Gully the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Myers Flat.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.