Overall score
Canley Heights
60.2/100
St Johns Park
47.5/100
Canley Heights for investment and value; St Johns Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Canley Heights
60.2/100
St Johns Park
47.5/100
Crime rate
Canley Heights
86.3 / 1k
St Johns Park
24.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Canley Heights
130
St Johns Park
64
Population
Canley Heights
12,320
St Johns Park
6,302
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Canley Heights | St Johns Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.2/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.9/100 | 48.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.3 / 1k | 24.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 57 | 59 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 130 | 64 |
| Planning activity | 8 | 5 |
| Population | 12,320 | 6,302 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 3/10 |
Put side by side, Canley Heights is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and St Johns Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Canley Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while St Johns Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Canley Heights is stronger for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities; St Johns Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Investors may find Canley Heights the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer St Johns Park.