Bonnyrigg Heights vs St Johns Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Bonnyrigg Heights for investment and value; St Johns Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bonnyrigg HeightsSt Johns Park

Overall score

Bonnyrigg Heights

44.3/100

St Johns Park

43.2/100

Crime rate

Bonnyrigg Heights

36.1 / 1k

St Johns Park

24.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bonnyrigg Heights

121

St Johns Park

77

Population

Bonnyrigg Heights

7,369

St Johns Park

6,302

Metric leadBonnyrigg Heights 6St Johns Park 43 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBonnyrigg HeightsSt Johns Park
Overall score44.3/10043.2/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10039.5/100
Crime rate36.1 / 1k24.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1010
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves96
Public transport stops9959
Walkability32.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities12177
Planning activity119
Green cover9.3%18.3%
Population7,3696,302
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bonnyrigg Heights is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and St Johns Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Bonnyrigg Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while St Johns Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bonnyrigg Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas St Johns Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Investors may find Bonnyrigg Heights the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer St Johns Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons