Fairfield West vs St Johns Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Fairfield West for investment; St Johns Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fairfield WestSt Johns Park

Overall score

Fairfield West

38.2/100

St Johns Park

43.2/100

Crime rate

Fairfield West

66.1 / 1k

St Johns Park

24.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fairfield West

121

St Johns Park

77

Population

Fairfield West

12,981

St Johns Park

6,302

Metric leadFairfield West 5St Johns Park 71 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFairfield WestSt Johns Park
Overall score38.2/10043.2/100
Housing (desirability)39.0/10039.5/100
Crime rate66.1 / 1k24.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools910
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves146
Public transport stops10759
Walkability55.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities12177
Planning activity109
Green cover7.7%18.3%
Population12,9816,302
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Fairfield West reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; St Johns Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Fairfield West pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas St Johns Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

Fairfield West suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas St Johns Park is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons