Overall score
Edensor Park
45.8/100
St Johns Park
43.2/100
Edensor Park for retirees; St Johns Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Edensor Park
45.8/100
St Johns Park
43.2/100
Crime rate
Edensor Park
24.8 / 1k
St Johns Park
24.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Edensor Park
117
St Johns Park
77
Population
Edensor Park
10,279
St Johns Park
6,302
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Edensor Park | St Johns Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.8/100 | 43.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.1/100 | 39.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 24.8 / 1k | 24.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 80 | 59 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 117 | 77 |
| Planning activity | 17 | 9 |
| Green cover | 14.7% | 18.3% |
| Population | 10,279 | 6,302 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 3/10 |
Edensor Park reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; St Johns Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Edensor Park is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; St Johns Park answers with a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Edensor Park, while St Johns Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.