Overall score
Edensor Park
57.2/100
St Johns Park
47.5/100
Edensor Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Edensor Park
57.2/100
St Johns Park
47.5/100
Crime rate
Edensor Park
24.8 / 1k
St Johns Park
24.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Edensor Park
100
St Johns Park
64
Population
Edensor Park
10,279
St Johns Park
6,302
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Edensor Park | St Johns Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.2/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.1/100 | 48.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 24.8 / 1k | 24.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 80 | 59 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 100 | 64 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 5 |
| Population | 10,279 | 6,302 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 3/10 |
Edensor Park reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; St Johns Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Edensor Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and public transport access; St Johns Park answers with schools and education options and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Edensor Park if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward St Johns Park for families and households prioritising schools.