Edensor Park vs Horsley Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Edensor Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Edensor ParkHorsley Park

Overall score

Edensor Park

45.8/100

Horsley Park

37.9/100

Crime rate

Edensor Park

24.8 / 1k

Horsley Park

90.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Edensor Park

117

Horsley Park

92

Population

Edensor Park

10,279

Horsley Park

1,790

Metric leadEdensor Park 9Horsley Park 21 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEdensor ParkHorsley Park
Overall score45.8/10037.9/100
Housing (desirability)39.1/10015.3/100
Crime rate24.8 / 1k90.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools103
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves6—
Public transport stops80119
Walkability63.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities11792
Planning activity1718
Green cover14.7%6.7%
Population10,2791,790
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Edensor Park reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Horsley Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Edensor Park tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Horsley Park stands out for public transport access and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Edensor Park sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Horsley Park.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Edensor Park, while Horsley Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons