Mount Pritchard vs St Johns Park, NSW suburb comparison

Mount Pritchard for investment and value; St Johns Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount PritchardSt Johns Park

Overall score

Mount Pritchard

53.4/100

St Johns Park

47.5/100

Crime rate

Mount Pritchard

168.7 / 1k

St Johns Park

24.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Pritchard

158

St Johns Park

64

Population

Mount Pritchard

10,426

St Johns Park

6,302

Metric leadMount Pritchard 8St Johns Park 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount PritchardSt Johns Park
Overall score53.4/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)48.4/10048.1/100
Crime rate168.7 / 1k24.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1210
Parks & reserves126
Public transport stops15359
Walkability85.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities15864
Planning activity85
Population10,4266,302
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Mount Pritchard is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks, while St Johns Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Mount Pritchard sits among greener hillside streets, while St Johns Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Pritchard is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; St Johns Park answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Mount Pritchard suits investors more clearly, whereas St Johns Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons