Mount Pritchard vs St Johns Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mount Pritchard for investment; St Johns Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount PritchardSt Johns Park

Overall score

Mount Pritchard

39.4/100

St Johns Park

43.2/100

Crime rate

Mount Pritchard

168.7 / 1k

St Johns Park

24.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Pritchard

165

St Johns Park

77

Population

Mount Pritchard

10,426

St Johns Park

6,302

Metric leadMount Pritchard 7St Johns Park 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount PritchardSt Johns Park
Overall score39.4/10043.2/100
Housing (desirability)41.7/10039.5/100
Crime rate168.7 / 1k24.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1210
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves126
Public transport stops15359
Walkability85.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities16577
Planning activity119
Green cover7.4%18.3%
Population10,4266,302
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Mount Pritchard is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks, while St Johns Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Mount Pritchard sits among greener hillside streets, while St Johns Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Pritchard is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; St Johns Park answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Mount Pritchard suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas St Johns Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons