Overall score
Cardigan Village
45.3/100
Mitchell Park
40.2/100
Cardigan Village for retirees and families; Mitchell Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cardigan Village
45.3/100
Mitchell Park
40.2/100
Crime rate
Cardigan Village
25.5 / 1k
Mitchell Park
208.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cardigan Village
10
Mitchell Park
5
Population
Cardigan Village
957
Mitchell Park
887
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cardigan Village | Mitchell Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.3/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.5/100 | 88.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 25.5 / 1k | 208.9 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 10 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 15 |
| Population | 957 | 887 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Cardigan Village is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Mitchell Park is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Cardigan Village pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mitchell Park is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Cardigan Village sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Mitchell Park.
Cardigan Village suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mitchell Park is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.