Overall score
Lucas
59.4/100
Mitchell Park
40.2/100
Lucas for retirees and families; Mitchell Park for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lucas
59.4/100
Mitchell Park
40.2/100
Crime rate
Lucas
68.3 / 1k
Mitchell Park
208.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lucas
124
Mitchell Park
5
Population
Lucas
2,994
Mitchell Park
887
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lucas | Mitchell Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.4/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 83.1/100 | 88.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 68.3 / 1k | 208.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 7 | 4 |
| Walkability | 62.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 124 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 29 | 15 |
| Population | 2,994 | 887 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 2/10 |
Lucas is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Mitchell Park is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Lucas is stronger for public transport access and walkability; Mitchell Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Lucas generally means more mid-market housing value, while Mitchell Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Lucas if you are weighing retirees and value-focused buyers; lean toward Mitchell Park for families and investors.