Overall score
Learmonth
39.0/100
Mitchell Park
40.2/100
Learmonth vs Mitchell Park, VIC suburb comparison
Learmonth for retirees and families; Mitchell Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LearmonthMitchell Park
Crime rate
Learmonth
20.4 / 1k
Mitchell Park
208.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Learmonth
3
Mitchell Park
5
Population
Learmonth
396
Mitchell Park
887
Metric leadLearmonth 2Mitchell Park 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLearmonth
- Best for familiesLearmonth
- Best for investmentMitchell Park
- Best for best valueMitchell Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Learmonth | Mitchell Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.0/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.1/100 | 88.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 20.4 / 1k | 208.9 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 4 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 15 |
| Population | 396 | 887 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Learmonth is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Mitchell Park is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Learmonth tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Mitchell Park stands out for housing affordability and public transport access. Learmonth generally means more mid-market housing value, while Mitchell Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and families may find Learmonth the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mitchell Park.