Caringbah vs Sylvania Waters, NSW Suburb Comparison

Caringbah for retirees and schools; Sylvania Waters for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CaringbahSylvania Waters

Overall score

Caringbah

60.7/100

Sylvania Waters

54.3/100

Crime rate

Caringbah

46.5 / 1k

Sylvania Waters

33.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caringbah

597

Sylvania Waters

97

Population

Caringbah

12,575

Sylvania Waters

3,200

Metric leadCaringbah 8Sylvania Waters 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaringbahSylvania Waters
Overall score60.7/10054.3/100
Housing (desirability)59.4/10040.9/100
Crime rate46.5 / 1k33.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools129
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves71
Public transport stops15041
Walkability100.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities59797
Planning activity3816
Green cover1.9%5.6%
Population12,5753,200
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Caringbah reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Sylvania Waters is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Caringbah is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Sylvania Waters answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Caringbah the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Sylvania Waters.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons