Overall score
Caringbah
68.0/100
Sylvania Waters
52.7/100
Caringbah vs Sylvania Waters, NSW suburb comparison
Caringbah for families and schools; Sylvania Waters for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CaringbahSylvania Waters
Crime rate
Caringbah
46.5 / 1k
Sylvania Waters
33.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Caringbah
591
Sylvania Waters
95
Population
Caringbah
12,575
Sylvania Waters
3,200
Metric leadCaringbah 7Sylvania Waters 4across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesCaringbah
- Best for investmentSylvania Waters
- Best for best schoolsCaringbah
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Caringbah | Sylvania Waters |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 68.0/100 | 52.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 17.4/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.5 / 1k | 33.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 150 | 41 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 49.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 591 | 95 |
| Planning activity | 34 | 15 |
| Population | 12,575 | 3,200 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Caringbah reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Sylvania Waters is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Caringbah is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Sylvania Waters answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Caringbah the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Sylvania Waters.