Overall score
Caringbah
60.7/100
Sylvania Waters
54.3/100
Caringbah for retirees and schools; Sylvania Waters for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Caringbah
60.7/100
Sylvania Waters
54.3/100
Crime rate
Caringbah
46.5 / 1k
Sylvania Waters
33.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Caringbah
597
Sylvania Waters
97
Population
Caringbah
12,575
Sylvania Waters
3,200
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Caringbah | Sylvania Waters |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.7/100 | 54.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.4/100 | 40.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.5 / 1k | 33.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 150 | 41 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 49.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 597 | 97 |
| Planning activity | 38 | 16 |
| Green cover | 1.9% | 5.6% |
| Population | 12,575 | 3,200 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Caringbah reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Sylvania Waters is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Caringbah is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Sylvania Waters answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Caringbah the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Sylvania Waters.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.