Castlereagh vs Cranebrook, NSW Suburb Comparison

Castlereagh for schools; Cranebrook for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CastlereaghCranebrook

Overall score

Castlereagh

42.3/100

Cranebrook

50.9/100

Crime rate

Castlereagh

52.4 / 1k

Cranebrook

52.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Castlereagh

17

Cranebrook

335

Population

Castlereagh

1,248

Cranebrook

15,779

Metric leadCastlereagh 3Cranebrook 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCastlereaghCranebrook
Overall score42.3/10050.9/100
Housing (desirability)18.3/10047.7/100
Crime rate52.4 / 1k52.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves29
Public transport stops25205
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities17335
Planning activity1528
Green cover6.4%18.5%
Population1,24815,779
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/105/10

Comparison summary

Castlereagh is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, while Cranebrook is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Castlereagh sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Cranebrook is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Castlereagh is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Cranebrook answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cranebrook, while Castlereagh remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons