Berkshire Park vs Cranebrook, NSW Suburb Comparison

Berkshire Park for schools; Cranebrook for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Berkshire ParkCranebrook

Overall score

Berkshire Park

41.3/100

Cranebrook

50.9/100

Crime rate

Berkshire Park

39.7 / 1k

Cranebrook

52.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Berkshire Park

12

Cranebrook

335

Population

Berkshire Park

2,149

Cranebrook

15,779

Metric leadBerkshire Park 2Cranebrook 63 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBerkshire ParkCranebrook
Overall score41.3/10050.9/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10047.7/100
Crime rate39.7 / 1k52.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools—6
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—9
Public transport stops34205
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities12335
Planning activity428
Green cover0.0%18.5%
Population2,14915,779
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Berkshire Park is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Cranebrook is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Berkshire Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Cranebrook is in a middle-ring position.

Berkshire Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Cranebrook is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cranebrook, while Berkshire Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons