Berkshire Park vs Jordan Springs, NSW Suburb Comparison

Berkshire Park for investment and schools; Jordan Springs for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Berkshire ParkJordan Springs

Overall score

Berkshire Park

41.3/100

Jordan Springs

41.5/100

Crime rate

Berkshire Park

39.7 / 1k

Jordan Springs

68.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Berkshire Park

12

Jordan Springs

138

Population

Berkshire Park

2,149

Jordan Springs

11,772

Metric leadBerkshire Park 2Jordan Springs 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBerkshire ParkJordan Springs
Overall score41.3/10041.5/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10042.6/100
Crime rate39.7 / 1k68.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops3474
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities12138
Planning activity421
Green cover0.0%50.2%
Population2,14911,772
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Berkshire Park reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Berkshire Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Jordan Springs is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Berkshire Park is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Jordan Springs answers with public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

Families may find Berkshire Park the better fit, while retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Jordan Springs.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons