Berkshire Park vs Jordan Springs, NSW suburb comparison

Berkshire Park for families; Jordan Springs for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Berkshire ParkJordan Springs

Overall score

Berkshire Park

35.6/100

Jordan Springs

47.5/100

Crime rate

Berkshire Park

39.7 / 1k

Jordan Springs

68.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Berkshire Park

10

Jordan Springs

130

Population

Berkshire Park

2,149

Jordan Springs

11,772

Metric leadBerkshire Park 3Jordan Springs 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBerkshire ParkJordan Springs
Overall score35.6/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)58.7/10053.7/100
Crime rate39.7 / 1k68.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops3474
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities10130
Planning activity414
Population2,14911,772
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Berkshire Park reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Berkshire Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Jordan Springs is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Berkshire Park is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Jordan Springs answers with public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities.

Families may find Berkshire Park the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Jordan Springs.

Related comparisons