Berkshire Park vs Jordan Springs, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Berkshire Park | Jordan Springs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.2/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.7/100 | 53.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 66.5 / 1k | 77.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 74 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 10 | 130 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 9 |
| Population | 2,149 | 11,772 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesJordan Springs
- Best for familiesBerkshire Park
- Best for investmentJordan Springs
- Best for best valueJordan Springs
- Best for best schoolsJordan Springs
Comparison summary
Berkshire Park and Jordan Springs offer different strengths across official suburb data. Jordan Springs leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Jordan Springs; Housing (desirability) favours Berkshire Park; Crime rate favours Berkshire Park. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Jordan Springs, Families → Berkshire Park, Investment → Jordan Springs, Best value → Jordan Springs.