Overall score
Jordan Springs
41.5/100
Werrington County
53.6/100
Jordan Springs for families and schools; Werrington County for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Jordan Springs
41.5/100
Werrington County
53.6/100
Crime rate
Jordan Springs
68.9 / 1k
Werrington County
68.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Jordan Springs
138
Werrington County
113
Population
Jordan Springs
11,772
Werrington County
3,698
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Jordan Springs | Werrington County |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.5/100 | 53.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.6/100 | 50.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 68.9 / 1k | 68.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 74 | 57 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 88.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 138 | 113 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 6 |
| Green cover | 50.2% | 20.2% |
| Population | 11,772 | 3,698 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Werrington County is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Jordan Springs pulls ahead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Werrington County is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and overall desirability.
Jordan Springs suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Werrington County is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.