Overall score
Jordan Springs
47.5/100
Werrington County
56.8/100
Jordan Springs for retirees and schools; Werrington County for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Jordan Springs
47.5/100
Werrington County
56.8/100
Crime rate
Jordan Springs
68.9 / 1k
Werrington County
68.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Jordan Springs
130
Werrington County
113
Population
Jordan Springs
11,772
Werrington County
3,698
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Jordan Springs | Werrington County |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.5/100 | 56.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.7/100 | 53.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 68.9 / 1k | 68.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 74 | 57 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 88.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 130 | 113 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 6 |
| Population | 11,772 | 3,698 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Werrington County is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Jordan Springs pulls ahead on parks and reserves and public transport access, whereas Werrington County is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and walkability.
Jordan Springs suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Werrington County is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.