Overall score
Cambridge Park
51.5/100
Jordan Springs
47.5/100
Cambridge Park for families and schools; Jordan Springs for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cambridge Park
51.5/100
Jordan Springs
47.5/100
Crime rate
Cambridge Park
68.8 / 1k
Jordan Springs
68.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cambridge Park
125
Jordan Springs
130
Population
Cambridge Park
7,054
Jordan Springs
11,772
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cambridge Park | Jordan Springs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.7/100 | 53.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 68.8 / 1k | 68.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 77 | 74 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 125 | 130 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 14 |
| Population | 7,054 | 11,772 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 10/10 |
Cambridge Park reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cambridge Park sits among greener hillside streets, while Jordan Springs keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Cambridge Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Jordan Springs answers with nearby cafés and amenities and a larger local community. Cambridge Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Jordan Springs leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Cambridge Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Jordan Springs for retirees.