Cambridge Park vs Jordan Springs, NSW suburb comparison

Cambridge Park for families and schools; Jordan Springs for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cambridge ParkJordan Springs

Overall score

Cambridge Park

51.5/100

Jordan Springs

47.5/100

Crime rate

Cambridge Park

68.8 / 1k

Jordan Springs

68.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cambridge Park

125

Jordan Springs

130

Population

Cambridge Park

7,054

Jordan Springs

11,772

Metric leadCambridge Park 7Jordan Springs 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCambridge ParkJordan Springs
Overall score51.5/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)53.7/10053.7/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k68.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools92
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops7774
Walkability57.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities125130
Planning activity614
Population7,05411,772
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/1010/10

Comparison summary

Cambridge Park reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cambridge Park sits among greener hillside streets, while Jordan Springs keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cambridge Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Jordan Springs answers with nearby cafés and amenities and a larger local community. Cambridge Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Jordan Springs leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Cambridge Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Jordan Springs for retirees.

Related comparisons