Cambridge Park vs Jordan Springs, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cambridge Park for investment; Jordan Springs for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cambridge ParkJordan Springs

Overall score

Cambridge Park

41.0/100

Jordan Springs

41.5/100

Crime rate

Cambridge Park

68.8 / 1k

Jordan Springs

68.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cambridge Park

126

Jordan Springs

138

Population

Cambridge Park

7,054

Jordan Springs

11,772

Metric leadCambridge Park 7Jordan Springs 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCambridge ParkJordan Springs
Overall score41.0/10041.5/100
Housing (desirability)56.6/10042.6/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k68.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools92
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops7774
Walkability57.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities126138
Planning activity821
Green cover9.5%50.2%
Population7,05411,772
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/1010/10

Comparison summary

Cambridge Park reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cambridge Park sits among greener hillside streets, while Jordan Springs keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cambridge Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Jordan Springs answers with nearby cafés and amenities, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Choose Cambridge Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Jordan Springs for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons