Caddens vs Cambridge Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Caddens for families and schools; Cambridge Park for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CaddensCambridge Park

Overall score

Caddens

43.6/100

Cambridge Park

41.0/100

Crime rate

Caddens

68.8 / 1k

Cambridge Park

68.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caddens

136

Cambridge Park

126

Population

Caddens

3,487

Cambridge Park

7,054

Metric leadCaddens 4Cambridge Park 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaddensCambridge Park
Overall score43.6/10041.0/100
Housing (desirability)39.6/10056.6/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k68.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops3377
Walkability30.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities136126
Planning activity138
Green cover12.7%9.5%
Population3,4877,054
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/102/10

Comparison summary

Caddens is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Cambridge Park is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Cambridge Park sits among greener hillside streets, while Caddens keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Caddens is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; Cambridge Park answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Caddens suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Cambridge Park is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons