Caddens vs Cambridge Park, NSW suburb comparison

Caddens for retirees and schools; Cambridge Park for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CaddensCambridge Park

Overall score

Caddens

44.5/100

Cambridge Park

51.5/100

Crime rate

Caddens

68.8 / 1k

Cambridge Park

68.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caddens

134

Cambridge Park

125

Population

Caddens

3,487

Cambridge Park

7,054

Metric leadCaddens 2Cambridge Park 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaddensCambridge Park
Overall score44.5/10051.5/100
Housing (desirability)53.7/10053.7/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k68.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops3377
Walkability30.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities134125
Planning activity136
Population3,4877,054
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/102/10

Comparison summary

Caddens is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Cambridge Park is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Cambridge Park sits among greener hillside streets, while Caddens keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Caddens is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Cambridge Park answers with parks and reserves and public transport access. Caddens generally means more sought-after housing, while Cambridge Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Caddens suits retirees more clearly, whereas Cambridge Park is the stronger match for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons