Caddens vs Orchard Hills, NSW Suburb Comparison

Caddens for families; Orchard Hills for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CaddensOrchard Hills

Overall score

Caddens

43.6/100

Orchard Hills

44.7/100

Crime rate

Caddens

68.8 / 1k

Orchard Hills

43.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caddens

136

Orchard Hills

8

Population

Caddens

3,487

Orchard Hills

1,798

Metric leadCaddens 5Orchard Hills 53 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaddensOrchard Hills
Overall score43.6/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)39.6/10045.6/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k43.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools64
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops3347
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities1368
Planning activity1378
Green cover12.7%23.8%
Population3,4871,798
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Caddens reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Orchard Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Orchard Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Caddens keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Caddens is stronger for schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook; Orchard Hills answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access. On housing, Caddens sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Orchard Hills.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Caddens the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Orchard Hills.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons