Overall score
Luddenham
45.9/100
Orchard Hills
48.0/100
Luddenham for retirees; Orchard Hills for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Luddenham
45.9/100
Orchard Hills
48.0/100
Crime rate
Luddenham
28.8 / 1k
Orchard Hills
43.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Luddenham
18
Orchard Hills
3
Population
Luddenham
1,927
Orchard Hills
1,798
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Luddenham | Orchard Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.9/100 | 48.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.9/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.8 / 1k | 43.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 47 |
| Walkability | 28.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 61 |
| Population | 1,927 | 1,798 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Orchard Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Luddenham sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Orchard Hills is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Luddenham is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Orchard Hills answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Luddenham sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Orchard Hills.
Luddenham suits retirees more clearly, whereas Orchard Hills is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.