Luddenham vs Orchard Hills, NSW Suburb Comparison

Luddenham for families and investment; Orchard Hills for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LuddenhamOrchard Hills

Overall score

Luddenham

50.2/100

Orchard Hills

44.7/100

Crime rate

Luddenham

28.8 / 1k

Orchard Hills

43.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Luddenham

19

Orchard Hills

8

Population

Luddenham

1,927

Orchard Hills

1,798

Metric leadLuddenham 7Orchard Hills 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLuddenhamOrchard Hills
Overall score50.2/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)43.4/10045.6/100
Crime rate28.8 / 1k43.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops1947
Walkability28.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities198
Planning activity1478
Green cover3.3%23.8%
Population1,9271,798
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Orchard Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Luddenham sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Orchard Hills is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Luddenham is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities; Orchard Hills answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access. On housing, Luddenham sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Orchard Hills.

Luddenham suits retirees more clearly, whereas Orchard Hills is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons