Luddenham vs Orchard Hills, NSW suburb comparison

Luddenham for retirees; Orchard Hills for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LuddenhamOrchard Hills

Overall score

Luddenham

45.9/100

Orchard Hills

48.0/100

Crime rate

Luddenham

28.8 / 1k

Orchard Hills

43.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Luddenham

18

Orchard Hills

3

Population

Luddenham

1,927

Orchard Hills

1,798

Metric leadLuddenham 6Orchard Hills 5across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLuddenhamOrchard Hills
Overall score45.9/10048.0/100
Housing (desirability)57.9/10076.0/100
Crime rate28.8 / 1k43.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops1947
Walkability28.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities183
Planning activity1161
Population1,9271,798
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Orchard Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Luddenham sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Orchard Hills is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Luddenham is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Orchard Hills answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Luddenham sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Orchard Hills.

Luddenham suits retirees more clearly, whereas Orchard Hills is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons