Overall score
Kemps Creek
31.3/100
Luddenham
50.2/100
Kemps Creek for schools; Luddenham for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kemps Creek
31.3/100
Luddenham
50.2/100
Crime rate
Kemps Creek
93.3 / 1k
Luddenham
28.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kemps Creek
20
Luddenham
19
Population
Kemps Creek
2,121
Luddenham
1,927
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kemps Creek | Luddenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.3/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.6/100 | 43.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 93.3 / 1k | 28.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 69 | 19 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 28.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 20 | 19 |
| Planning activity | 19 | 14 |
| Green cover | 7.0% | 3.3% |
| Population | 2,121 | 1,927 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Kemps Creek is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Luddenham sits among greener hillside streets, while Kemps Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Kemps Creek is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Luddenham answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.
Choose Kemps Creek if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Luddenham for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.