Overall score
Kemps Creek
38.6/100
Luddenham
45.9/100
Kemps Creek vs Luddenham, NSW suburb comparison
Kemps Creek for schools; Luddenham for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kemps CreekLuddenham
Crime rate
Kemps Creek
93.3 / 1k
Luddenham
28.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kemps Creek
19
Luddenham
18
Population
Kemps Creek
2,121
Luddenham
1,927
Metric leadKemps Creek 4Luddenham 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLuddenham
- Best for familiesLuddenham
- Best for best valueLuddenham
- Best for best schoolsKemps Creek
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kemps Creek | Luddenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.6/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.8/100 | 57.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 93.3 / 1k | 28.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 69 | 19 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 28.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 19 | 18 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 11 |
| Population | 2,121 | 1,927 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Kemps Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Luddenham sits among greener hillside streets, while Kemps Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Kemps Creek is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Luddenham answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Kemps Creek if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Luddenham for retirees and families.