Kemps Creek vs Luddenham, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kemps Creek for schools; Luddenham for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kemps CreekLuddenham

Overall score

Kemps Creek

31.3/100

Luddenham

50.2/100

Crime rate

Kemps Creek

93.3 / 1k

Luddenham

28.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kemps Creek

20

Luddenham

19

Population

Kemps Creek

2,121

Luddenham

1,927

Metric leadKemps Creek 5Luddenham 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKemps CreekLuddenham
Overall score31.3/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)26.6/10043.4/100
Crime rate93.3 / 1k28.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops6919
Walkability34.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities2019
Planning activity1914
Green cover7.0%3.3%
Population2,1211,927
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Kemps Creek is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Luddenham sits among greener hillside streets, while Kemps Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Kemps Creek is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Luddenham answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

Choose Kemps Creek if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Luddenham for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons