Overall score
Kemps Creek
38.6/100
Mount Vernon
35.7/100
Kemps Creek for families and schools; Mount Vernon for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kemps Creek
38.6/100
Mount Vernon
35.7/100
Crime rate
Kemps Creek
93.3 / 1k
Mount Vernon
93.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kemps Creek
19
Mount Vernon
9
Population
Kemps Creek
2,121
Mount Vernon
1,235
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kemps Creek | Mount Vernon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.6/100 | 35.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.8/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 93.3 / 1k | 93.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 69 | 22 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 19 | 9 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 12 |
| Population | 2,121 | 1,235 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Kemps Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Mount Vernon is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Vernon sits among greener hillside streets, while Kemps Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kemps Creek pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Mount Vernon is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Kemps Creek the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Mount Vernon.