Kemps Creek vs Mount Vernon, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kemps Creek for retirees; Mount Vernon for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kemps CreekMount Vernon

Overall score

Kemps Creek

31.3/100

Mount Vernon

37.2/100

Crime rate

Kemps Creek

93.3 / 1k

Mount Vernon

93.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kemps Creek

20

Mount Vernon

10

Population

Kemps Creek

2,121

Mount Vernon

1,235

Metric leadKemps Creek 5Mount Vernon 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKemps CreekMount Vernon
Overall score31.3/10037.2/100
Housing (desirability)26.6/10038.4/100
Crime rate93.3 / 1k93.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves2—
Public transport stops6922
Walkability34.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2010
Planning activity1915
Green cover7.0%0.8%
Population2,1211,235
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kemps Creek is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Mount Vernon is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Vernon sits among greener hillside streets, while Kemps Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Kemps Creek pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Mount Vernon is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Kemps Creek the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Vernon.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons