Erskine Park vs Mount Vernon, NSW Suburb Comparison

Erskine Park for retirees and families; Mount Vernon for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Erskine ParkMount Vernon

Overall score

Erskine Park

52.6/100

Mount Vernon

37.2/100

Crime rate

Erskine Park

29.9 / 1k

Mount Vernon

93.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Erskine Park

150

Mount Vernon

10

Population

Erskine Park

6,486

Mount Vernon

1,235

Metric leadErskine Park 9Mount Vernon 11 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryErskine ParkMount Vernon
Overall score52.6/10037.2/100
Housing (desirability)42.1/10038.4/100
Crime rate29.9 / 1k93.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools4—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves7—
Public transport stops8822
Walkability55.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities15010
Planning activity1215
Green cover13.9%0.8%
Population6,4861,235
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Erskine Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Mount Vernon is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Vernon sits among greener hillside streets, while Erskine Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Erskine Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, while Mount Vernon stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Erskine Park the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Mount Vernon.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons