Overall score
Erskine Park
62.2/100
Mount Vernon
35.7/100
Erskine Park for retirees and families; Mount Vernon for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Erskine Park
62.2/100
Mount Vernon
35.7/100
Crime rate
Erskine Park
29.9 / 1k
Mount Vernon
93.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Erskine Park
147
Mount Vernon
9
Population
Erskine Park
6,486
Mount Vernon
1,235
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Erskine Park | Mount Vernon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.2/100 | 35.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.9/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.9 / 1k | 93.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | — |
| Public transport stops | 88 | 22 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 147 | 9 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 12 |
| Population | 6,486 | 1,235 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Erskine Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Mount Vernon is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Vernon sits among greener hillside streets, while Erskine Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Erskine Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Mount Vernon stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Retirees and families may find Erskine Park the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Mount Vernon.