Erskine Park vs Mount Vernon, NSW suburb comparison

Erskine Park for retirees and families; Mount Vernon for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Erskine ParkMount Vernon

Overall score

Erskine Park

62.2/100

Mount Vernon

35.7/100

Crime rate

Erskine Park

29.9 / 1k

Mount Vernon

93.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Erskine Park

147

Mount Vernon

9

Population

Erskine Park

6,486

Mount Vernon

1,235

Metric leadErskine Park 7Mount Vernon 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryErskine ParkMount Vernon
Overall score62.2/10035.7/100
Housing (desirability)52.9/10076.0/100
Crime rate29.9 / 1k93.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools4
Parks & reserves7
Public transport stops8822
Walkability55.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities1479
Planning activity1012
Population6,4861,235
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Erskine Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Mount Vernon is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Vernon sits among greener hillside streets, while Erskine Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Erskine Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Mount Vernon stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Retirees and families may find Erskine Park the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Mount Vernon.

Related comparisons