Erskine Park vs Oxley Park, NSW suburb comparison

Erskine Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Erskine ParkOxley Park

Overall score

Erskine Park

62.2/100

Oxley Park

43.5/100

Crime rate

Erskine Park

29.9 / 1k

Oxley Park

123.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Erskine Park

147

Oxley Park

45

Population

Erskine Park

6,486

Oxley Park

4,197

Metric leadErskine Park 9Oxley Park 2across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryErskine ParkOxley Park
Overall score62.2/10043.5/100
Housing (desirability)52.9/10051.3/100
Crime rate29.9 / 1k123.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools410
Parks & reserves74
Public transport stops8835
Walkability55.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities14745
Planning activity108
Population6,4864,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Erskine Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Oxley Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Erskine Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Oxley Park stands out for a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Erskine Park sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Oxley Park.

Retirees and families may find Erskine Park the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Oxley Park.

Related comparisons