Overall score
Erskine Park
62.2/100
Kemps Creek
38.6/100
Erskine Park vs Kemps Creek, NSW suburb comparison
Erskine Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Erskine ParkKemps Creek
Crime rate
Erskine Park
29.9 / 1k
Kemps Creek
93.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Erskine Park
147
Kemps Creek
19
Population
Erskine Park
6,486
Kemps Creek
2,121
Metric leadErskine Park 11Kemps Creek 0across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesErskine Park
- Best for familiesErskine Park
- Best for investmentErskine Park
- Best for best valueErskine Park
- Best for best schoolsErskine Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Erskine Park | Kemps Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.2/100 | 38.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.9/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.9 / 1k | 93.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 88 | 69 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 147 | 19 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 14 |
| Population | 6,486 | 2,121 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Erskine Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Kemps Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Erskine Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Kemps Creek is further out with more breathing room.
Erskine Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kemps Creek is the better pick for schools and education options.
Erskine Park suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Kemps Creek is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.