Claremont Meadows vs Oxley Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Claremont Meadows for retirees and families; Oxley Park for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Claremont MeadowsOxley Park

Overall score

Claremont Meadows

43.6/100

Oxley Park

31.9/100

Crime rate

Claremont Meadows

68.9 / 1k

Oxley Park

123.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Claremont Meadows

99

Oxley Park

45

Population

Claremont Meadows

5,177

Oxley Park

4,197

Metric leadClaremont Meadows 8Oxley Park 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaremont MeadowsOxley Park
Overall score43.6/10031.9/100
Housing (desirability)16.1/10049.5/100
Crime rate68.9 / 1k123.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools710
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops6835
Walkability63.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities9945
Planning activity1410
Green cover27.0%10.4%
Population5,1774,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Claremont Meadows is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Oxley Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Claremont Meadows pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Oxley Park is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

Claremont Meadows suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Oxley Park is the stronger match for families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons