Overall score
Claremont Meadows
43.6/100
Orchard Hills
44.7/100
Orchard Hills for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Claremont Meadows
43.6/100
Orchard Hills
44.7/100
Crime rate
Claremont Meadows
68.9 / 1k
Orchard Hills
43.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Claremont Meadows
99
Orchard Hills
8
Population
Claremont Meadows
5,177
Orchard Hills
1,798
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Claremont Meadows | Orchard Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.6/100 | 44.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.1/100 | 45.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 68.9 / 1k | 43.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 68 | 47 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 99 | 8 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 78 |
| Green cover | 27.0% | 23.8% |
| Population | 5,177 | 1,798 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Claremont Meadows reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Orchard Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Orchard Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Claremont Meadows keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Claremont Meadows is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Orchard Hills answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Claremont Meadows generally means more sought-after housing, while Orchard Hills leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Claremont Meadows the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Orchard Hills.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.