Overall score
Glenmore Park
70.3/100
Luddenham
45.9/100
Glenmore Park for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glenmore Park
70.3/100
Luddenham
45.9/100
Crime rate
Glenmore Park
28.7 / 1k
Luddenham
28.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenmore Park
353
Luddenham
18
Population
Glenmore Park
25,021
Luddenham
1,927
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenmore Park | Luddenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.3/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.0/100 | 57.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.7 / 1k | 28.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 216 | 19 |
| Walkability | 71.0/100 | 28.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 353 | 18 |
| Planning activity | 33 | 11 |
| Population | 25,021 | 1,927 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Glenmore Park is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Luddenham sits among greener hillside streets, while Glenmore Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Glenmore Park is stronger for schools and education options and parks and reserves; Luddenham answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Glenmore Park, while Luddenham remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.