Luddenham vs Mulgoa, NSW Suburb Comparison

Luddenham for retirees; Mulgoa for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LuddenhamMulgoa

Overall score

Luddenham

50.2/100

Mulgoa

53.2/100

Crime rate

Luddenham

28.8 / 1k

Mulgoa

28.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Luddenham

19

Mulgoa

28

Population

Luddenham

1,927

Mulgoa

2,044

Metric leadLuddenham 4Mulgoa 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLuddenhamMulgoa
Overall score50.2/10053.2/100
Housing (desirability)43.4/10048.3/100
Crime rate28.8 / 1k28.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops1945
Walkability28.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities1928
Planning activity1426
Green cover3.3%9.0%
Population1,9272,044
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Mulgoa is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.

On the data, Luddenham is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and a calmer planning outlook; Mulgoa answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Retirees may find Luddenham the better fit, while families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mulgoa.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons