Overall score
Luddenham
45.9/100
Mulgoa
53.1/100
Luddenham for retirees; Mulgoa for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Luddenham
45.9/100
Mulgoa
53.1/100
Crime rate
Luddenham
28.8 / 1k
Mulgoa
28.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Luddenham
18
Mulgoa
28
Population
Luddenham
1,927
Mulgoa
2,044
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Luddenham | Mulgoa |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.9/100 | 53.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.9/100 | 62.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.8 / 1k | 28.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 45 |
| Walkability | 28.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 28 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 18 |
| Population | 1,927 | 2,044 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Luddenham is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Mulgoa is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Luddenham is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Mulgoa answers with housing affordability and public transport access.
Retirees may find Luddenham the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mulgoa.