Cambridge Park vs Werrington, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cambridge Park for investment and value; Werrington for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cambridge ParkWerrington

Overall score

Cambridge Park

41.0/100

Werrington

46.7/100

Crime rate

Cambridge Park

68.8 / 1k

Werrington

68.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cambridge Park

126

Werrington

241

Population

Cambridge Park

7,054

Werrington

5,328

Metric leadCambridge Park 4Werrington 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCambridge ParkWerrington
Overall score41.0/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)56.6/10042.3/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k68.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools910
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops7759
Walkability57.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities126241
Planning activity813
Green cover9.5%18.6%
Population7,0545,328
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Cambridge Park reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Werrington is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cambridge Park sits among greener hillside streets, while Werrington keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cambridge Park is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook; Werrington answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Cambridge Park, while Werrington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons