Cambridge Gardens vs Jordan Springs, NSW suburb comparison

Cambridge Gardens for families and schools; Jordan Springs for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cambridge GardensJordan Springs

Overall score

Cambridge Gardens

45.1/100

Jordan Springs

47.5/100

Crime rate

Cambridge Gardens

68.7 / 1k

Jordan Springs

68.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cambridge Gardens

51

Jordan Springs

130

Population

Cambridge Gardens

2,030

Jordan Springs

11,772

Metric leadCambridge Gardens 4Jordan Springs 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCambridge GardensJordan Springs
Overall score45.1/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)53.7/10053.7/100
Crime rate68.7 / 1k68.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools62
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops2574
Walkability63.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities51130
Planning activity214
Population2,03011,772
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cambridge Gardens is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Jordan Springs is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cambridge Gardens sits among greener hillside streets, while Jordan Springs keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cambridge Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile and walkability; Jordan Springs answers with public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Cambridge Gardens if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Jordan Springs for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons