Cambridge Gardens vs Werrington County, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cambridge Gardens for families and schools; Werrington County for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cambridge GardensWerrington County

Overall score

Cambridge Gardens

45.1/100

Werrington County

53.6/100

Crime rate

Cambridge Gardens

68.7 / 1k

Werrington County

68.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cambridge Gardens

51

Werrington County

113

Population

Cambridge Gardens

2,030

Werrington County

3,698

Metric leadCambridge Gardens 4Werrington County 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCambridge GardensWerrington County
Overall score45.1/10053.6/100
Housing (desirability)52.2/10050.9/100
Crime rate68.7 / 1k68.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops2557
Walkability63.0/10088.0/100
Nearby amenities51113
Planning activity26
Green cover9.4%20.2%
Population2,0303,698
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Cambridge Gardens reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Werrington County is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cambridge Gardens sits among greener hillside streets, while Werrington County keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Cambridge Gardens tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, while Werrington County stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Cambridge Gardens if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Werrington County for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons