Cecil Hills vs Middleton Grange, NSW suburb comparison

Cecil Hills for value; Middleton Grange for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cecil HillsMiddleton Grange

Overall score

Cecil Hills

61.1/100

Middleton Grange

53.0/100

Crime rate

Cecil Hills

20.9 / 1k

Middleton Grange

20.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cecil Hills

89

Middleton Grange

57

Population

Cecil Hills

6,906

Middleton Grange

7,043

Metric leadCecil Hills 6Middleton Grange 14 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCecil HillsMiddleton Grange
Overall score61.1/10053.0/100
Housing (desirability)56.7/10056.7/100
Crime rate20.9 / 1k20.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Parks & reserves135
Public transport stops6322
Walkability57.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities8957
Planning activity34
Population6,9067,043
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Cecil Hills reads as a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks; Middleton Grange is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Middleton Grange keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cecil Hills is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Middleton Grange answers with a quieter safety profile and a larger local community.

Cecil Hills suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Middleton Grange is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons