Cecil Hills vs Middleton Grange, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cecil Hills for retirees and schools; Middleton Grange for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cecil HillsMiddleton Grange

Overall score

Cecil Hills

50.1/100

Middleton Grange

50.2/100

Crime rate

Cecil Hills

20.9 / 1k

Middleton Grange

20.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cecil Hills

107

Middleton Grange

70

Population

Cecil Hills

6,906

Middleton Grange

7,043

Metric leadCecil Hills 6Middleton Grange 25 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCecil HillsMiddleton Grange
Overall score50.1/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10038.4/100
Crime rate20.9 / 1k20.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves135
Public transport stops6322
Walkability57.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities10770
Planning activity34
Green cover42.7%17.7%
Population6,9067,043
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Cecil Hills reads as a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks; Middleton Grange is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Middleton Grange keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cecil Hills is stronger for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability; Middleton Grange answers with a larger local community.

Cecil Hills suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Middleton Grange is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons