Busby vs Cecil Hills, NSW suburb comparison

Cecil Hills for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BusbyCecil Hills

Overall score

Busby

38.5/100

Cecil Hills

61.1/100

Crime rate

Busby

72.9 / 1k

Cecil Hills

20.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Busby

34

Cecil Hills

89

Population

Busby

4,446

Cecil Hills

6,906

Metric leadBusby 1Cecil Hills 10across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBusbyCecil Hills
Overall score38.5/10061.1/100
Housing (desirability)37.3/10056.7/100
Crime rate72.9 / 1k20.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools134
Parks & reserves513
Public transport stops3563
Walkability30.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities3489
Planning activity63
Population4,4466,906
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Busby is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while Cecil Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Busby keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Busby tends to lead on excellent public transport and relatively affordable housing, while Cecil Hills stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Busby generally means more approachable housing costs, while Cecil Hills leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cecil Hills, while Busby remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons

Busby vs Cecil Hills, NSW suburb comparison | Suburb Guide