Busby vs Cecil Hills, NSW Suburb Comparison

Busby for investment; Cecil Hills for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BusbyCecil Hills

Overall score

Busby

27.8/100

Cecil Hills

50.1/100

Crime rate

Busby

72.9 / 1k

Cecil Hills

20.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Busby

41

Cecil Hills

107

Population

Busby

4,446

Cecil Hills

6,906

Metric leadBusby 1Cecil Hills 111 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBusbyCecil Hills
Overall score27.8/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)20.4/10038.4/100
Crime rate72.9 / 1k20.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools134
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves513
Public transport stops3563
Walkability30.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities41107
Planning activity63
Green cover10.5%42.7%
Population4,4466,906
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Busby is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, while Cecil Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Busby keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Busby tends to lead on schools and education options, while Cecil Hills stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cecil Hills, while Busby remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons