Overall score
Busby
38.5/100
Cecil Hills
61.1/100
Cecil Hills for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Busby
38.5/100
Cecil Hills
61.1/100
Crime rate
Busby
72.9 / 1k
Cecil Hills
20.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Busby
34
Cecil Hills
89
Population
Busby
4,446
Cecil Hills
6,906
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Busby | Cecil Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.5/100 | 61.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 56.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.9 / 1k | 20.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 63 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 34 | 89 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 3 |
| Population | 4,446 | 6,906 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Busby is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while Cecil Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Busby keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Busby tends to lead on excellent public transport and relatively affordable housing, while Cecil Hills stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Busby generally means more approachable housing costs, while Cecil Hills leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cecil Hills, while Busby remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.