Overall score
Busby
38.5/100
Lurnea
47.5/100
Busby for retirees; Lurnea for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Busby
38.5/100
Lurnea
47.5/100
Crime rate
Busby
72.9 / 1k
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Busby
34
Lurnea
107
Population
Busby
4,446
Lurnea
10,057
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Busby | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.9 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 127 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 34 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 8 |
| Population | 4,446 | 10,057 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Busby is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Busby sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lurnea is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Busby is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Lurnea answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.
Choose Busby if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Lurnea for families and value-focused buyers.