Busby vs Lurnea, NSW Suburb Comparison

Busby for retirees; Lurnea for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BusbyLurnea

Overall score

Busby

27.8/100

Lurnea

31.0/100

Crime rate

Busby

72.9 / 1k

Lurnea

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Busby

41

Lurnea

116

Population

Busby

4,446

Lurnea

10,057

Metric leadBusby 4Lurnea 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBusbyLurnea
Overall score27.8/10031.0/100
Housing (desirability)20.4/10040.8/100
Crime rate72.9 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1311
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves513
Public transport stops35127
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities41116
Planning activity610
Green cover10.5%9.7%
Population4,44610,057
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Busby is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Busby is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Lurnea answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Choose Busby if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Lurnea for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons