Overall score
Busby
27.8/100
Lurnea
31.0/100
Busby for retirees; Lurnea for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Busby
27.8/100
Lurnea
31.0/100
Crime rate
Busby
72.9 / 1k
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Busby
41
Lurnea
116
Population
Busby
4,446
Lurnea
10,057
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Busby | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 27.8/100 | 31.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 20.4/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.9 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 11 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 127 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 41 | 116 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 10 |
| Green cover | 10.5% | 9.7% |
| Population | 4,446 | 10,057 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Busby is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Busby is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Lurnea answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Choose Busby if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Lurnea for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.