Busby vs Lurnea, NSW suburb comparison

Busby for retirees; Lurnea for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BusbyLurnea

Overall score

Busby

38.5/100

Lurnea

47.5/100

Crime rate

Busby

72.9 / 1k

Lurnea

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Busby

34

Lurnea

107

Population

Busby

4,446

Lurnea

10,057

Metric leadBusby 3Lurnea 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBusbyLurnea
Overall score38.5/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)37.3/10048.4/100
Crime rate72.9 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1311
Parks & reserves513
Public transport stops35127
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities34107
Planning activity68
Population4,44610,057
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Busby is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Busby sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lurnea is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Busby is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Lurnea answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.

Choose Busby if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Lurnea for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons