Overall score
Liverpool
39.9/100
Lurnea
31.0/100
Liverpool for retirees; Lurnea for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Liverpool
39.9/100
Lurnea
31.0/100
Crime rate
Liverpool
168.6 / 1k
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Liverpool
878
Lurnea
116
Population
Liverpool
31,078
Lurnea
10,057
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Liverpool | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.9/100 | 31.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.4/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 168.6 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 11 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 277 | 127 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 878 | 116 |
| Planning activity | 47 | 10 |
| Green cover | 11.7% | 9.7% |
| Population | 31,078 | 10,057 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Liverpool pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Lurnea is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lurnea, while Liverpool remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.