Liverpool vs Lurnea, NSW Suburb Comparison

Liverpool for retirees; Lurnea for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LiverpoolLurnea

Overall score

Liverpool

39.9/100

Lurnea

31.0/100

Crime rate

Liverpool

168.6 / 1k

Lurnea

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Liverpool

878

Lurnea

116

Population

Liverpool

31,078

Lurnea

10,057

Metric leadLiverpool 8Lurnea 23 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLiverpoolLurnea
Overall score39.9/10031.0/100
Housing (desirability)35.4/10040.8/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1411
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves2413
Public transport stops277127
Walkability100.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities878116
Planning activity4710
Green cover11.7%9.7%
Population31,07810,057
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Liverpool pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Lurnea is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lurnea, while Liverpool remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons