Overall score
Liverpool
56.3/100
Lurnea
47.5/100
Liverpool vs Lurnea, NSW suburb comparison
Lurnea for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LiverpoolLurnea
Crime rate
Liverpool
168.6 / 1k
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Liverpool
853
Lurnea
107
Population
Liverpool
31,078
Lurnea
10,057
Metric leadLiverpool 7Lurnea 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Liverpool | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.3/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.6/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 168.6 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 277 | 127 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 853 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 8 |
| Population | 31,078 | 10,057 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Liverpool pulls ahead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, whereas Lurnea is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
Liverpool suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Lurnea is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.