Overall score
Cartwright
27.4/100
Liverpool
39.9/100
Cartwright for families and investment; Liverpool for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cartwright
27.4/100
Liverpool
39.9/100
Crime rate
Cartwright
72.8 / 1k
Liverpool
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cartwright
37
Liverpool
878
Population
Cartwright
2,616
Liverpool
31,078
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cartwright | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 27.4/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 32.6/100 | 35.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.8 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 14 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 277 |
| Walkability | 25.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 878 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 47 |
| Green cover | 30.1% | 11.7% |
| Population | 2,616 | 31,078 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Cartwright reads as a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand; Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cartwright sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Liverpool is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Cartwright is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Liverpool answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.
Retirees and families may find Cartwright the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Liverpool.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.