Cartwright vs Liverpool, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cartwright for families and investment; Liverpool for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CartwrightLiverpool

Overall score

Cartwright

27.4/100

Liverpool

39.9/100

Crime rate

Cartwright

72.8 / 1k

Liverpool

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cartwright

37

Liverpool

878

Population

Cartwright

2,616

Liverpool

31,078

Metric leadCartwright 3Liverpool 73 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCartwrightLiverpool
Overall score27.4/10039.9/100
Housing (desirability)32.6/10035.4/100
Crime rate72.8 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1414
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves924
Public transport stops17277
Walkability25.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities37878
Planning activity447
Green cover30.1%11.7%
Population2,61631,078
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Cartwright reads as a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand; Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cartwright sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Liverpool is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Cartwright is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Liverpool answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

Retirees and families may find Cartwright the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Liverpool.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons