Cartwright vs Hoxton Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Hoxton Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CartwrightHoxton Park

Overall score

Cartwright

27.4/100

Hoxton Park

49.0/100

Crime rate

Cartwright

72.8 / 1k

Hoxton Park

20.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cartwright

37

Hoxton Park

81

Population

Cartwright

2,616

Hoxton Park

4,572

Metric leadCartwright 3Hoxton Park 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCartwrightHoxton Park
Overall score27.4/10049.0/100
Housing (desirability)32.6/10038.8/100
Crime rate72.8 / 1k20.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools149
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves94
Public transport stops1737
Walkability25.5/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities3781
Planning activity43
Green cover30.1%14.2%
Population2,6164,572
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cartwright is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Hoxton Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cartwright sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Hoxton Park is in a middle-ring position.

Cartwright tends to lead on schools and education options, plus parks and reserves, while Hoxton Park stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hoxton Park, while Cartwright remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons