Cartwright vs Casula, NSW suburb comparison

Cartwright for families and schools; Casula for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CartwrightCasula

Overall score

Cartwright

31.2/100

Casula

58.5/100

Crime rate

Cartwright

72.8 / 1k

Casula

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cartwright

26

Casula

252

Population

Cartwright

2,616

Casula

16,584

Metric leadCartwright 3Casula 8across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCartwrightCasula
Overall score31.2/10058.5/100
Housing (desirability)26.3/10048.4/100
Crime rate72.8 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools144
Parks & reserves922
Public transport stops17197
Walkability25.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities26252
Planning activity326
Population2,61616,584
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Cartwright reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Casula is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Cartwright sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Casula is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Cartwright is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Casula answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Cartwright sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Casula.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Casula, while Cartwright remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons