Liverpool vs Parramatta, NSW suburb comparison

Liverpool for investment; Parramatta for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LiverpoolParramatta

Overall score

Liverpool

56.3/100

Parramatta

62.5/100

Crime rate

Liverpool

168.6 / 1k

Parramatta

245.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Liverpool

853

Parramatta

1,662

Population

Liverpool

31,078

Parramatta

30,211

Metric leadLiverpool 5Parramatta 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLiverpoolParramatta
Overall score56.3/10062.5/100
Housing (desirability)18.6/10014.2/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k245.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1416
Parks & reserves2424
Public transport stops277215
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities8531,662
Planning activity3068
Population31,07830,211
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/109/10

Comparison summary

Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Parramatta is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Liverpool is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Parramatta answers with nearby cafés and amenities and overall desirability. Liverpool generally means more approachable housing costs, while Parramatta leans toward more sought-after housing.

Liverpool suits investors more clearly, whereas Parramatta is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons