Chipping Norton vs Liverpool, NSW suburb comparison

Chipping Norton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chipping NortonLiverpool

Overall score

Chipping Norton

57.8/100

Liverpool

56.3/100

Crime rate

Chipping Norton

168.6 / 1k

Liverpool

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chipping Norton

110

Liverpool

853

Population

Chipping Norton

9,412

Liverpool

31,078

Metric leadChipping Norton 5Liverpool 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChipping NortonLiverpool
Overall score57.8/10056.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.4/10018.6/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools714
Parks & reserves2824
Public transport stops109277
Walkability61.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities110853
Planning activity2031
Population9,41231,078
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chipping Norton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Chipping Norton pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Liverpool is the better pick for schools and education options and public transport access. Chipping Norton generally means more sought-after housing, while Liverpool leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Chipping Norton, while Liverpool remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons