Overall score
Chipping Norton
48.0/100
Moorebank
59.9/100
Chipping Norton vs Moorebank, NSW Suburb Comparison
Moorebank for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Chipping NortonMoorebank
Crime rate
Chipping Norton
168.6 / 1k
Moorebank
12.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chipping Norton
124
Moorebank
246
Population
Chipping Norton
9,412
Moorebank
11,408
Metric leadChipping Norton 6Moorebank 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chipping Norton | Moorebank |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.0/100 | 59.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.0/100 | 44.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 168.6 / 1k | 12.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 28 | 23 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 135 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 124 | 246 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 35 |
| Green cover | 15.5% | 8.3% |
| Population | 9,412 | 11,408 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Chipping Norton reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Moorebank is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Chipping Norton pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability, whereas Moorebank is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Moorebank, while Chipping Norton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.