Overall score
Moorebank
59.9/100
Warwick Farm
40.6/100
Moorebank vs Warwick Farm, NSW Suburb Comparison
Moorebank for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MoorebankWarwick Farm
Crime rate
Moorebank
12.5 / 1k
Warwick Farm
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Moorebank
246
Warwick Farm
156
Population
Moorebank
11,408
Warwick Farm
6,135
Metric leadMoorebank 8Warwick Farm 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Moorebank | Warwick Farm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.9/100 | 40.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.2/100 | 50.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.5 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 23 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 135 | 58 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 246 | 156 |
| Planning activity | 35 | 16 |
| Green cover | 8.3% | 15.7% |
| Population | 11,408 | 6,135 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Moorebank is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Moorebank pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, whereas Warwick Farm is the better pick for schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Moorebank, while Warwick Farm remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.