Lansvale vs Warwick Farm, NSW Suburb Comparison

Lansvale for families and value; Warwick Farm for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LansvaleWarwick Farm

Overall score

Lansvale

40.0/100

Warwick Farm

40.6/100

Crime rate

Lansvale

168.6 / 1k

Warwick Farm

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lansvale

72

Warwick Farm

156

Population

Lansvale

2,595

Warwick Farm

6,135

Metric leadLansvale 5Warwick Farm 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLansvaleWarwick Farm
Overall score40.0/10040.6/100
Housing (desirability)42.4/10050.9/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools810
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves142
Public transport stops6058
Walkability36.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities72156
Planning activity816
Green cover19.3%15.7%
Population2,5956,135
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lansvale is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Lansvale is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Warwick Farm answers with schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lansvale, while Warwick Farm remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons