Overall score
Lansvale
49.6/100
Warwick Farm
44.2/100
Lansvale for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lansvale
49.6/100
Warwick Farm
44.2/100
Crime rate
Lansvale
168.6 / 1k
Warwick Farm
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lansvale
64
Warwick Farm
144
Population
Lansvale
2,595
Warwick Farm
6,135
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lansvale | Warwick Farm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.6/100 | 44.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.4/100 | 18.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 168.6 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 60 | 58 |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 64 | 144 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 12 |
| Population | 2,595 | 6,135 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Lansvale is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Lansvale is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Warwick Farm answers with a quieter safety profile and walkability.
Choose Lansvale if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Warwick Farm for families and households prioritising schools.