Lansvale vs Warwick Farm, NSW suburb comparison

Lansvale for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LansvaleWarwick Farm

Overall score

Lansvale

49.6/100

Warwick Farm

44.2/100

Crime rate

Lansvale

168.6 / 1k

Warwick Farm

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lansvale

64

Warwick Farm

144

Population

Lansvale

2,595

Warwick Farm

6,135

Metric leadLansvale 6Warwick Farm 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLansvaleWarwick Farm
Overall score49.6/10044.2/100
Housing (desirability)48.4/10018.4/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools810
Parks & reserves142
Public transport stops6058
Walkability36.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities64144
Planning activity512
Population2,5956,135
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lansvale is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Lansvale is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Warwick Farm answers with a quieter safety profile and walkability.

Choose Lansvale if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Warwick Farm for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons