Voyager Point vs Warwick Farm, NSW Suburb Comparison

Voyager Point for retirees and families; Warwick Farm for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Voyager PointWarwick Farm

Overall score

Voyager Point

55.4/100

Warwick Farm

40.6/100

Crime rate

Voyager Point

13.0 / 1k

Warwick Farm

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Voyager Point

29

Warwick Farm

156

Population

Voyager Point

1,678

Warwick Farm

6,135

Metric leadVoyager Point 5Warwick Farm 71 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryVoyager PointWarwick Farm
Overall score55.4/10040.6/100
Housing (desirability)41.5/10050.9/100
Crime rate13.0 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools510
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops2158
Walkability30.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities29156
Planning activity116
Green cover58.0%15.7%
Population1,6786,135
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Voyager Point is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Voyager Point sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Warwick Farm is in a middle-ring position.

Voyager Point tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while Warwick Farm stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Voyager Point, while Warwick Farm remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons