Liverpool vs Warwick Farm, NSW Suburb Comparison

Liverpool for retirees; Warwick Farm for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LiverpoolWarwick Farm

Overall score

Liverpool

39.9/100

Warwick Farm

40.6/100

Crime rate

Liverpool

168.6 / 1k

Warwick Farm

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Liverpool

878

Warwick Farm

156

Population

Liverpool

31,078

Warwick Farm

6,135

Metric leadLiverpool 6Warwick Farm 43 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLiverpoolWarwick Farm
Overall score39.9/10040.6/100
Housing (desirability)35.4/10050.9/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1410
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves242
Public transport stops27758
Walkability100.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities878156
Planning activity4716
Green cover11.7%15.7%
Population31,0786,135
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Liverpool reads as a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Liverpool tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Warwick Farm stands out for a calmer planning outlook.

Value-focused buyers may find Liverpool the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Warwick Farm.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons