Overall score
Chipping Norton
57.8/100
Warwick Farm
44.2/100
Chipping Norton for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chipping Norton
57.8/100
Warwick Farm
44.2/100
Crime rate
Chipping Norton
168.6 / 1k
Warwick Farm
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chipping Norton
110
Warwick Farm
144
Population
Chipping Norton
9,412
Warwick Farm
6,135
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chipping Norton | Warwick Farm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.8/100 | 44.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.4/100 | 18.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 168.6 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 28 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 58 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 110 | 144 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 13 |
| Population | 9,412 | 6,135 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Chipping Norton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Chipping Norton pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Warwick Farm is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Chipping Norton sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Warwick Farm.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Chipping Norton, while Warwick Farm remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.