Chipping Norton vs Warwick Farm, NSW suburb comparison

Chipping Norton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chipping NortonWarwick Farm

Overall score

Chipping Norton

57.8/100

Warwick Farm

44.2/100

Crime rate

Chipping Norton

168.6 / 1k

Warwick Farm

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chipping Norton

110

Warwick Farm

144

Population

Chipping Norton

9,412

Warwick Farm

6,135

Metric leadChipping Norton 7Warwick Farm 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChipping NortonWarwick Farm
Overall score57.8/10044.2/100
Housing (desirability)48.4/10018.4/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools710
Parks & reserves282
Public transport stops10958
Walkability61.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities110144
Planning activity2013
Population9,4126,135
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chipping Norton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Warwick Farm is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Chipping Norton pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Warwick Farm is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Chipping Norton sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Warwick Farm.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Chipping Norton, while Warwick Farm remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons

Chipping Norton vs Warwick Farm, NSW suburb… | Suburb Guide