Chipping Norton vs Pleasure Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

Chipping Norton for investment and value; Pleasure Point for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chipping NortonPleasure Point

Overall score

Chipping Norton

48.0/100

Pleasure Point

43.1/100

Crime rate

Chipping Norton

168.6 / 1k

Pleasure Point

13.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chipping Norton

124

Pleasure Point

10

Population

Chipping Norton

9,412

Pleasure Point

606

Metric leadChipping Norton 9Pleasure Point 31 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChipping NortonPleasure Point
Overall score48.0/10043.1/100
Housing (desirability)45.0/10012.7/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k13.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools75
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves281
Public transport stops1097
Walkability61.0/10010.5/100
Nearby amenities12410
Planning activity232
Green cover15.5%1.4%
Population9,412606
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chipping Norton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Pleasure Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Chipping Norton sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Pleasure Point is further out with more breathing room.

Chipping Norton pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Pleasure Point is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Choose Chipping Norton if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Pleasure Point for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons