Overall score
Chipping Norton
57.8/100
Voyager Point
39.9/100
Chipping Norton for investment and schools; Voyager Point for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chipping Norton
57.8/100
Voyager Point
39.9/100
Crime rate
Chipping Norton
168.6 / 1k
Voyager Point
13.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chipping Norton
110
Voyager Point
25
Population
Chipping Norton
9,412
Voyager Point
1,678
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chipping Norton | Voyager Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.8/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.4/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 168.6 / 1k | 13.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 28 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 21 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 110 | 25 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 1 |
| Population | 9,412 | 1,678 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Chipping Norton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Voyager Point is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Chipping Norton sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Voyager Point is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Chipping Norton is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Voyager Point answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Chipping Norton the better fit, while retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Voyager Point.