Chipping Norton vs Voyager Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

Chipping Norton for investment and schools; Voyager Point for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chipping NortonVoyager Point

Overall score

Chipping Norton

48.0/100

Voyager Point

55.4/100

Crime rate

Chipping Norton

168.6 / 1k

Voyager Point

13.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chipping Norton

124

Voyager Point

29

Population

Chipping Norton

9,412

Voyager Point

1,678

Metric leadChipping Norton 7Voyager Point 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChipping NortonVoyager Point
Overall score48.0/10055.4/100
Housing (desirability)45.0/10041.5/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k13.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools75
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves281
Public transport stops10921
Walkability61.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities12429
Planning activity231
Green cover15.5%58.0%
Population9,4121,678
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chipping Norton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Voyager Point is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Chipping Norton sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Voyager Point is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Chipping Norton is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Voyager Point answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Investors and households prioritising schools may find Chipping Norton the better fit, while retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Voyager Point.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons